Bastian Berenz vs Nico Hipfl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does recent second serve performance compare? Hipfl has won 43.21% of points on their second serve over the past 6 months, while Berenz has not won any.
• In terms of returning games, Hipfl excels, having won 43.43% of their opponent's second serve points recently, with Berenz again securing 0%.
• Do first serve return stats suggest a significant advantage? Yes, Hipfl has a success rate of 22.55%, whereas Berenz has yet to win a first serve return point.
• Under pressure, Hipfl manages to save 49.57% of breakpoints; Berenz has not saved any in the same timeframe.
• Performance overview raises questions: Hipfl won 45.45% of their matches over the last year; Berenz has an impressive win rate of 83.33%, though over significantly fewer matches.
• Which surface favors each player? Hipfl is best on Hard courts with a 58% win rate, but Berenz dominates Clay with an 83% win percentage.
• Player levels differ: Both compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Berenz showcases far higher success with an 83.33% win rate.
• Hipfl faces more competitive adversaries, playing against opponents with an average rank of 364.79, while Berenz has not competed against ranked opponents.
• Who thrives in decisive moments? Hipfl claims 40% of deciding sets, whereas Berenz captures 75%, a critical metric for potential match outcomes.
• Breakpoint efficiency observed in recent matches shows Hipfl converting 24% of opportunities; Berenz has not converted any.

Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance patterns, Hipfl demonstrates consistent success in second serve points, both when serving and returning. Their capability to save breakpoints and outperform Berenz in first serve return points suggests resilience during high-pressure situations.

However, Berenz's strong overall win rate indicates capability, albeit over a smaller sample size and against potentially lower-ranked opponents. Their decisive set performance is notably better, an important advantage in tightly contested matches.

Surface preference also plays a critical role, with Hipfl favoring hard courts while Berenz excels on clay. As the surface for the upcoming match hasn't been specified, this could swing predictions depending on the conditions.

Given these factors, despite Berenz's potent match win record, Hipfl's overall adaptability and recent form on serve and return indicate they are more likely to emerge victoriously in this encounter, particularly if the match is played on Hard courts.